The accuracy shibboleth in historical movies
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoZwJT9k3Jhs_I1qTMyPBixSajlkW-iuujj4Y4BQ5v9_mwEf_lyagb9tzReKlvB_-ktIxj3H06pPeL6CXkeK7SJJLW-WGv-4jTIHhaCdTI81Tr8DMpc05PRc0RpYcUGI5qkHxcG0e_diQt/s320/saving-private-ryan.jpg)
It's a movie A friend suggests that since I'm not a fan of movies about historical events, I will like this essay by British historian Anthony Beevor, Beevor, with a new book to promote, seeks to shock, I think, by dissing canonical films like Saving Private Ryan and Schindler's List For a long time now, my wife has refused to watch a war movie with me. This is because I cannot stop grinding my teeth with annoyance at major historical mistakes, or harrumphing over errors of period detail. Actually Beevor's essay makes me grind my teeth, and for the same reason I sometimes claim to dislike dramas about history. He insists they have to be true -- and the filmmakers insist they are true. Neither side seems willing to admit that a drama is a drama. It doesn't have to be literally true; it just has to work as a drama. So Beevor shouts at Saving Private Ryan (okay, he likes the opening slaughter) for not including the British role in D-Day and for offering a melodr...